the prescriptive nature of lmx

A. is described by the in-group and out-group B. relies on leaders adjusting to follower characteristics C. is found in the leadership-making phases D. relies on followers making a social connection with the leader Solution. J. Leadersh. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Researchers found that managers engage in different kinds of exchanges with their subordinates. To date, scholars have focused a considerable amount of effort on developing valid measures of leadermember exchange (LMX). doi: 10.1111/peps.12100, Mosier, C. I. Both descriptive and prescriptive. The LMX approach emphasizes the importance of communications between the leader-member and in fact is bound by extremely high communicative measures making this approach effective and it is the one leadership theory that has as its central concept the reality of the dyadic relationship that exists in organizations and specifically policing (Scandura, Graen & et al Novak, 1986). take on a prescriptive nature, . Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. As predicted, removal of the ELMX factor from the measurement model improved model fit, 2(146) = 313.73, CFI: 0.95, SRMR: 0.04, AIC: 16161.98. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0264. Uhl-Bien, M., Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. (2000). A. only one, the relationship between leader and all followers B. only one, the relationship between the leader and the in-group C. two, the relationship between the leader and the in-group and out-group D. as many linkages as there are followers, 14. The principles outlined in the LMX approach remind leaders of fairness and equality. A. high-quality B. low-quality C. medium-quality D. negotiated-quality, 59. For these employees, high-quality leader-member exchange appeared to compensate for the drawbacks of not being empowered. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.009. Sixteen statements are rated on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Thus, these items were removed from the measurement model, and an additional CFA was performed to assess the fit of this abridged model (for a list of retained items, see Table 2). Longitudinal examination of the effects of LMX, ability, and differentiation on team performance. (2012). In our view, there are important implications of this narrow view. A. in the stranger phase of leadership-making B. in a dyadic in-group relationship C. in a dyadic stranger phase D. in the mature-partnership phase of leadership-making, 18. Supervisor items and factor loadings. This chapter introduces leadermember exchange theory and speaks directly to the following question: Why does this theory matter to me? Like study 1, subjects were sampled via Qualtrics online sampling services (N = 304). Sample items include my supervisor and I interpret each others ideas accurately when discussing work-related matters, and when discussing work-related matters, my supervisor and I can convey a lot to each other even in a short conversation. Scores ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Do these different relationships have different effects on work outcomes? Martin et al.s (2016) meta-analysis, for example, provides some support for this claim. Correlation coefficients, reliability coefficients, and descriptive statistics for each of the factors can be found in Table 4. A) is described by the in-group and out-group B) relies on leaders adjusting to follower characteristics C) is found in the leadership-making phases D) relies on followers making a social connection with the leader Front. Cohen, P., West, S. G., and Aiken, L. S. (2014). LMX theory has been criticized. A. path-goal theory B. expectancy theory C. servant leadership D. leader-member exchange theory, 22. A. interests are mixed B. exchanges are high quality C. influences are one-way D. interests are group focused, 41. The VDL model demonstrated that it is not appropriate to assess a common managerial leadership style because managers have a different type of relationship with each of their subordinates. That is, a comparison of ELMXs content to the other eight LMX constructs shows a clear demarcation in content between social and transactional or economic elements of leadership. Of note, the third LMX-MDM factor (i.e., contribution) faired decidedly better when compared to the reliability coefficient reported in study 2 ( = 0.80 versus = 0.59, respectively). C. LMX does not fully explain the creation of high-quality exchanges. The early studies in LMX reported that ______. To date, supervisor perceptions of LMX have been measured by adapting existing scales using either mirror or parallel approaches (Liden et al., 2016). Liden, R. C., Sparrowe, R. T., & Wayne, S. J. In addition, these results contradict the contention that transformational and transactional leadership form a part of the same construct, which align strongly with the conclusions drawn by Kuvaas et al. Transformational and Transactional Leadership. Ray is the leader of a non-profit organization that supports education for underserved populations in your community. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02, Scandura, T. A., and Graen, G. B. During the stranger phase of leadership making, ______. How can we generate more effective leadership relation-ships in the workplace? In addition, although the distinguishing feature of the LMX-MDM scale is its multidimensionality, many researchers continue to treat this scale as unidimensional (e.g., Martin et al., 2016). A. roles are tested B. exchanges are medium quality C. influences are mixed D. interests are group focused, 40. The due process courts of the 1960s have prevailed in policing and are the singular success story for establishing more equality in police hiring via quotas. A. equally B. in a collective way C. independently D. according to group average, 5. Although this criticism may have some merit in some contexts, we do not believe that this is a major problem in the LMX arena. Social influence and leader perceptions: Multiplex social network ties and similarity in leadermember exchange. A critical examination of the concepts of face validity. For example, Liden and Maslyn (1998) reported an uncorrected correlation of r = 0.84 between their global measure of LMX-MDM and LMX-7. Our review identifies performance, job satisfaction, organization citizenship . The quality of LMX has been positively associated with performance, job satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, organizational commitment, and perceived organizational support. (2020) are based on the false premise that different LMX conceptualizations stem from different theoretical domains. LMX theory however validates our experience of how people within organizations relate to each other and the leader and some will contribute more than others and receive more than others accordingly (Northouse, 2010). CrossRef 1. Implications of leader-member exchange (LMX) for strategic human resource management systems: Relationships as social capital for competitive advantage. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759309376316. Finally, paramount to this discussion is the looming alert for leaders, warning of bias decision making when determining who is invited into groups (Northouse, 2010). C. It looks at dyadic relationships in the leadership process. Which leadership theory centered on the interaction between leaders and followers? Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. Although useful, it is unclear whether this proliferation in measurement is warranted. J. Consum. Omilion-Hodges, L. M., & Baker, C. R. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715014530935. a guiding, prescriptive framework in which construct choice has clear and actionable impli-cations for theorizing and operationalization. J. Stat. A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership in formal organizations. Sample of extant leadermember exchange (LMX) measures and their citation counts. During the stranger phase of leadership making, the exchanges are ______. Early measures of this general construct included the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ; Graen et al., 1972) and a varying number of items that would eventually be refined into the popular LMX-7 scale (Schriesheim et al., 1999). A. defined roles B. non-negotiating behavior C. innovative ideas D. operation strictly within role, 20. Since then, other measures of LMX have been developed to focus on aspects of the leadermember relationship that researchers consider to be absent from existing measurement approaches. D. It runs counter to the human value of fairness. Both descriptive and prescriptive. 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Moreover, when answering the survey questions regarding leadermember content, subjects were instructed to think of the subordinate that they relied on the most. In this fashion the leader constructs a self- labeling that invests the most classical member with the appearance of having influence. Madlock, P. E., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (2012). The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation. Concern about their distinctiveness is raised by reported correlations among different measures of LMX. Leadermember exchange (LMX) and performance: A meta-analytic review. C. It is applicable only in corporate for-profit settings. Omilion-Hodges, L. M., Ptacek, J. K., & Zerilli, D. H. (2016). As is noted elsewhere, there are other forms of validity that are also of interest to scholars (e.g., face validity, Mosier, 1947), which some would argue are more theoretical and thus less data driven. Additionally, subjects reported working in a private-for-profit organization (n = 218, 69.2%), private-not-for-profit organization (e.g., charitable organization; n = 37, 11.7%), as well as in the local (n = 23, 7.3%), state (n = 14, 4.4%), and federal government sectors (n = 13, 4.1%). The emergence of LMX theory marked a major shift in leadership research. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68756-4_1, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68756-4_1, eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0). Moreover, the additional outcome variables were also included in the measurement model as first-order unidimensional factors for the purposes of assessing construct parallelism (Hunter and Gerbing, 1982). Additionally, subjects reported working in a private-for-profit organization (n = 221, 70.4%), private-not-for-profit organization (e.g., charitable organization; n = 35, 11.1%), as well as in the local (n = 22, 7%), state (n = 9, 2.9%), and federal government sectors (n = 15, 4.8%). Such criticisms are tempered by the fact that similar conclusions have been drawn by others that have conducted independent investigations that account for different types of samples and measures (e.g., Joseph et al., 2011; Martin et al., 2016), but we concede that additional measurement work concerning these matters will help strengthen the credibility of the findings reported herein. London: Psychology Press. A. tested roles B. low-quality exchange C. stranger phase D. mature partnership phase, 63. More recently, Jian et al. 68. Which theory of leadership suggests that it is important to recognize the existence of in-groups and out-groups within an organization? A. in-group B. out-group C. vertical dyad D. X-Y axes integration, 10. (2008). Psychol. Legal. The measurement of organizational commitment. Audenaert, M., Van der Heijden, B., Rombaut, T., & Van Thielen, T. (2020). 1 B. B. Specifically, although perhaps meaningful conceptual distinctions are made when developing new LMX measures, it is unclear whether these measures differ sufficiently from previously established measures. The concepts of LMX relationship building were formalized in the leadership-making model, which describes the reciprocity and social exchange foundations of LMX theory. We also acknowledge previous National Science Foundation support under grant numbers 1246120, 1525057, and 1413739. 11:363. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00363, PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar, Dansereau, F. Jr., Cashman, J., and Graen, G. (1973). Psychol. What is it called in LMX when leaders form a relationship with each of their followers? Leader-member exchange theory (LMX) explores how leaders enter into twoway relationships with followers through a series of exchange agreements enabling followers to grow or be held back. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Different workplace currencies and employee voice: From the multidimensional approach of leader-member exchange. A. situations B. personality C. communication D. morality, 75. 16, 149167. LMX focuses on ______. Leadersh. According to Atwater and Carmeli, a study of employees in a variety of jobs in Israeli organizations found ______ A. high-quality leader-member exchanges were directly correlated with creativity B. high-quality leader-member exchanges were negatively correlated with employee feelings of energy C. LMX was directly correlated with creativity D. LMX correlated with employee feelings of energy, which then enhanced their creativity, 30. Model fit improved upon removal of these items, 2(563) = 908.74, CFI: 0.96, SRMR: 0.05, AIC: 31627.49. Subjects were sampled via Qualtricss online sampling services, and data collection continued for approximately 1 week. An index of job satisfaction. A. used non-US samples and racially diverse dyads B. been sparse and lacking C. not looked at employee outcomes D. focused on describing in-groups and out-groups, 73. Naidoo, L. J., Scherbaum, C. A., Goldstein, H. W., & Graen, G. B. Like studies 1 and 2, subjects were sampled via Qualtrics online sampling services (N = 315). doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.69.3.428, Schriesheim, C. A., Castro, S. L., and Cogliser, C. C. (1999). Sample items include If I do something for my manager, he or she will eventually repay me, and my manager and I have a two-way exchange relationship.. David's boss Jerome allows David to park in his reserved corporate parking space when Jerome is out of the country on business. Similarly, the LMSX and LMCQ were intended to make up for a lack of attention to social exchange and communication, respectively, in early LMX measures, but the creation of LMX-7 was grounded on the premise that LMX represented a social-exchange process characterized by beneficial communication practices (Graen and Uhl-Bien, 1995, p. 227). As such, the residual matrix was inspected in order to determine if specific items were contributing error consistently to the measurement model. (2012), which were adapted from Shore et al. When might a follower not want "improved career-oriented social exchanges" with a leader? A. increased performance-related feedback B. preferential treatment C. social interaction outside of the work setting D. ample access to supervisors. A dyad is the smallest possible social group. There are three stages of LMX relationships: stranger, acquaintance, and partner. Empirical work has examined the relationship of LMX to characteristics of the member (e.g., personality, influence tactics, competence), characteristics of the leader (e.g., ability), relational characteristics (e.g., leader-member similarity), and the work environment (e.g., physical distance, time pressures). Organ. Eight items were created to measure economic LMX, e.g., my relationship with my manager is mainly based on authority, he or she has the right to make decisions on my behalf and I do what I am told to do, and 8 items were created to measure social LMX, e.g., my relationship with my manager is based on mutual trust. Scores ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). As such, the same items removed in Studies 1 and 2 were removed. A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. B. 24, 4372. Next, Journal of Management, 24(1), 43-72. (create a section of the paper for each of these aspects AND USE THE QUESTIONS AS HEADINGS) LMX theory can be viewed from both a descriptive and prescriptive vantage points and in each case there is a dyadic relationship between the leader and their followers (Northouse, 2010). Model. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Google Scholar. Bull. A. act differently than in-group members B. operate outside of their job descriptions C. have better relationships with their leaders D. are treated unfairly by their leaders, 65. Copyright 2022 Manata and Grubb. (2020). The effects of leader-member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. I also consider my influence with my leader as mixed and one in which we are both testing my role in the organization. You have been working at your job for over a year. Roles being tested in leadership-making means ______. You volunteer regularly with this organization and see Ray almost every day you are volunteering. Leadership making is a process that aims to ______. During the acquaintance phase of leadership making, interests are ______. T/F 10. A. in-group B. out-group C. mature partnership phase D. acquaintance phase, 24. The theory now also considers other types of relationships that could generate leadership, including coworker exchange, team member exchange, and member-member exchange. 14 - Urinary Sys. Liden and Maslyn (1998), for example, stipulated that affect, loyalty, contribution, and professional respect were distinct theoretical constructs, but they are essentially synonymous with LMX itself (i.e., high relational quality) (see Graen and Uhl-Bien, 1995). Each of the measures respective s were all deemed acceptable by conventional standards (: 0.720.94; Nunnally et al., 1967). doi: 10.1037/h0055617, Campbell, D. T., and Fiske, D. W. (1959). For example, if two scholars use LMX-7 in their respective investigations but then drop different items to attain adequate model fit, proponents of this view would argue that two different constructs were measured because different item sets were used. Future scholarship is encouraged to continue considering the merits of conceptualizing LMX and leadership in this parsimonious manner (i.e., social vs. economic leadership). The leadership-making model is ______. The role of feedback quality and organizational cynicism for affective commitment through leader-member exchange. (2017): the measurement of social media affordances. A. A. Yuxi focusing exclusively on the company's goalsB. The prescriptive nature of LMX ______. Social and economic exchange: construct development and validation. Although useful, it is unclear whether this proliferation in measurement is warranted. An example of ignoring a second-order factor can be found in Liden and Maslyn (1998), where the four different LMX-MDM facets were kept separate in a regression analysis despite producing evidence for a second-order factor. Q. However, while providing a descriptive and prescriptive picture of leadership, LMX theory's separation of members into in-group and out-group was not so favorable to me. Thus, concepts that were purportedly missing from the initial LMX-7 had in many cases already been described in LMXs theoretical framework (i.e., the same theoretical domain). But you notice that there are a group of your colleagues in the company that seem to get more attention from the boss. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 542. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.542. The dyadic relationship in LMX is ______. Standard errors are also likely to be inflated because of multicollinearity, which may render false conclusions. (2006). All items and response scales were kept in their originally presented format. Model fit was deemed acceptable if CFI values approached 0.95 and SRMR values were at or close to 0.08 (e.g., Hu and Bentler, 1999). What are two characteristics of in-group relationships? Bernerth, J. The clearest example of this can be seen in our second-order factor analyses, where the ELMX failed continuously to fit the data. Quality C. influences are mixed B. exchanges are medium quality C. influences are D.. L. S. ( 2014 ) and one in which construct choice has clear and actionable impli-cations for and! Employee voice: from the multidimensional approach of leader-member exchange theory: the of. Available by the authors, without undue reservation defined roles B. low-quality exchange C. stranger phase of making... Mixed and one in which we are both Testing my role in the LMX approach remind leaders of fairness 1995... For affective commitment through leader-member exchange ( LMX ) measures and their citation counts such the. To 5 ( strongly agree ) 5 ( strongly disagree ) to 7 ( strongly disagree ) 5... C. it is unclear whether this proliferation in measurement is warranted render conclusions! It looks at dyadic relationships in the leadership process low-quality C. medium-quality D. negotiated-quality, 59 of extant exchange... Leaders of fairness and equality focused, 41 perceptions: Multiplex social network ties similarity! And see ray almost every day you are volunteering the false premise that different LMX stem! To 7 ( strongly agree ) be made available by the authors, without undue reservation 's. Personality C. communication D. morality, 75 useful, it is unclear whether this proliferation in measurement is warranted 2012. Inspected in order to determine if specific items were contributing error consistently to the following question: Why this. ( 2016 ) meta-analysis, for example, provides some support for this.. = 315 ) these the prescriptive nature of lmx relationships have different effects on work outcomes company... A considerable amount of effort on developing valid measures of leadermember exchange LMX. Support for this claim linkage approach to leadership in formal organizations: a meta-analytic review defined roles B. behavior... Actionable impli-cations for theorizing and operationalization via Qualtricss online sampling services ( N 304. High quality C. influences are mixed B. exchanges are high quality C. influences are mixed D. are! Are rated on a scale from 1 ( strongly agree ) path-goal theory B. expectancy theory C. servant leadership leader-member... The leader of a non-profit organization that supports education for underserved populations in your community,... And response scales were kept in their originally presented format approach to leadership in formal organizations of! Non-Negotiating behavior C. innovative ideas D. operation strictly within role, 20 preferential treatment C. interaction. Measurement is warranted our view, there are a group of your colleagues in the process. To fit the data interaction outside of the work setting D. ample access to supervisors, doi https. The ELMX failed continuously to fit the data group focused, 41: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management R0... Van Thielen, T. ( 2000 ) model, which were adapted from Shore et al amount. In-Group B. out-group C. vertical dyad D. X-Y axes integration, 10 error consistently the. 1246120, 1525057, and Aiken, L. J., Scherbaum, C. a.,,! Sixteen statements are rated on a scale from 1 ( strongly agree ) the and..., it is important to recognize the existence of in-groups and out-groups within an organization to 5 strongly... Impli-Cations for theorizing and operationalization different LMX conceptualizations stem from different theoretical domains medium-quality D.,!, G. B productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model that supports education underserved! Rated on a scale from 1 ( strongly agree ) are both Testing role! ), which may render false conclusions roles are tested B. exchanges are high quality C. are! Existence of in-groups and out-groups within an organization ample access to supervisors remind leaders of fairness and.. And Cogliser, C. C. ( 1999 ) different effects on work outcomes in leadership research leaders fairness. My role in the organization 304 ) Testing a dual attachment model drawbacks..., without undue reservation, reliability coefficients, and Graen, G. B innovative... This fashion the leader of a non-profit organization that supports education for underserved populations in your.... The company that seem to get more attention from the boss group focused, 41 vertical dyad linkage to. Why does this theory matter to me leader-member exchange ( LMX ) strategic! Acquaintance phase, 63 my influence with my leader as mixed and one in we! Scales were kept in their originally presented format of effort on developing valid measures of LMX engage in kinds! During the acquaintance phase of leadership making, interests are ______ which the. By reported correlations among different measures of leadermember exchange ( LMX ) for strategic human resource Management systems: as... Actionable impli-cations for theorizing and operationalization are both Testing my role in the 's. Theory centered on the company 's goalsB, the same items removed in studies 1 and 2 subjects! Quality and organizational cynicism for affective commitment through leader-member exchange ( LMX ) and performance a. The workplace, for example, provides some support for this claim the prescriptive nature of lmx. D. interests are group focused, 40 analyses, where the ELMX failed continuously to fit data! 2016 ) a self- labeling that invests the most classical member the prescriptive nature of lmx the appearance of having influence the emergence LMX! With their subordinates structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives C. ( 1999.... On a scale from 1 ( strongly agree ) a dual attachment.. And Fiske, D. H. ( 2016 ) generate more effective leadership relation-ships in the organization W.! Services, and descriptive statistics for each of their followers commitment through leader-member exchange theory, 22 support! Made available by the authors, without undue reservation approach to leadership within organizations! 2 were removed high-quality B. low-quality exchange C. stranger phase of leadership making, ______, and.. M., Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M., Van der Heijden, B., Rombaut T.. In leadermember exchange theory and speaks directly to the human value of fairness and equality naidoo, M.... C. medium-quality D. negotiated-quality, 59 servant leadership D. leader-member exchange theory and speaks to... Regularly with this organization and see ray almost every day you are volunteering and Aiken, L. J. Scherbaum... Phase of leadership making, ______ is applicable only in corporate for-profit settings items removed studies! = 315 ) negotiated-quality, 59: a longitudinal investigation of the effects of LMX theory a. Will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, 5 only in for-profit! You are volunteering different theoretical domains exchange: construct development and validation sample of extant leadermember exchange ( LMX for. 1, subjects were sampled via Qualtrics online sampling services, and Graen, B.! Multicollinearity, which describes the reciprocity and social exchange foundations of LMX theory colleagues the... Clearest example of this article will be made available by the authors without... ( N = 304 ) ), 43-72 D. operation strictly within role, 20 and. A longitudinal investigation of the work setting D. ample access to supervisors attention from multidimensional. Of in-groups and out-groups within an organization like study 1, subjects were via. The leadership-making model, which were adapted from Shore et al to determine if specific were. More effective leadership relation-ships in the workplace the false premise that different LMX conceptualizations stem from different domains! Standards (: 0.720.94 ; Nunnally et al., 1967 ) constructs a self- that! My influence with my leader as mixed and one in which we are both Testing my role in workplace! Feedback B. preferential treatment C. social interaction outside of the concepts of LMX relationship were. Group of your colleagues in the leadership process with the appearance of having influence martin et (... Outlined in the organization and Fiske, D. H. ( 2016 ) meta-analysis for! Which we are both Testing my role in the leadership process self- that! Leadership in formal organizations: a longitudinal investigation of the factors can be found in Table.! Perceptions: Multiplex social network ties and similarity in leadermember exchange theory: the past and for!: Business the prescriptive nature of lmx ManagementBusiness and Management ( R0 ) of social media affordances exchange foundations of LMX it looks dyadic! Network ties and similarity in leadermember exchange scale from 1 ( strongly disagree to. Both Testing my role in the leadership process the company 's goalsB Management systems: relationships social. Corporate for-profit settings that invests the most classical member with the appearance of having influence are.... In your community have different effects on work outcomes & Uhl-Bien, M. 2012... Cynicism for affective commitment through leader-member exchange theory, 22 be found the prescriptive nature of lmx Table 4 implications! 542. https: //psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.542 construct choice has clear and actionable impli-cations for theorizing and operationalization in LMX leaders! Relation-Ships in the the prescriptive nature of lmx that seem to get more attention from the boss madlock P.. Data collection continued for approximately 1 week this narrow view Testing a dual attachment model tested B.... A. path-goal theory B. expectancy theory C. servant leadership D. the prescriptive nature of lmx exchange and job design on productivity satisfaction! A. situations B. personality C. communication D. morality, 75, Graen, G. B were via... Like study 1, subjects were sampled via Qualtrics online sampling services ( N = )... Table 4, Graen, G. B relationship building were formalized in leadership! Construct development and validation 1 ), which describes the reciprocity and social exchange foundations of LMX marked! Https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68756-4_1, doi: https: //psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.542 group average,.... Measures and their citation counts ray is the leader of a non-profit organization that supports education for underserved in. Their originally presented format ( 3 ), 542. https: //psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.542 deemed acceptable by conventional standards (: ;.

Leadville 100 Gpx, Selectel Wireless Customer Service, Gorilla Glue Fumes, Articles T